KIPT, Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal initiates the standardization of trial decisions.
As it says “it is difficult for a layperson to understand the terms and texts of trial decisions”, since trial decisions are varied depending on examiners in terms of their formality and used terms, it has been raised that there are some difficulties for the parties involved in understanding their own trial decision.
To solve the problem above, KIPT published “Manual for Trial Decision Standardization” by arranging the formality of trial decisions, knowhow of the writing to types of trial decisions and terms and phases which need harmonization.
As “Manual for Trial Decision Standardization”, through analyzing the cases of the superior trial decisions, provides not only standard forms to types of trials and trial decisions but also, some knowhow of writing the comparison judgment among the reasons of a trial decisions, it could be used as an essential guide book for making highquality trial decisions.
The judge of KIPT said that “the work of the standardization of trial decisions enabled us to improve the convenience of the patent clients and to promote the improvement of the quality of patent trials, and that furthermore, KIPT as an exclusive institution for trial would do their best to heightened the competiveness of the country and corporations by solving the increasing disputes over intellectual property rights promptly and correctly